When should writers take their words offline?


A startling success story: CaliforniaWatch attracted readers to their exposé on seismically unsound UC Berkeley buildings by distributing fliers. On paper. To humans. In meatspace!

It’s a strategy so obvious (to anyone who lived pre-Internet) I’m surprised we don’t see it more often. Yes, of course, when you’re writing about an issue of local interest, you can connect directly to local people! That’s something that internet-marketing simply can’t do.

Of course, similar tactics have been tried: I’m thinking of The Daily Blog, an absolutely ridiculous project that combined the worst of newspapers with the worst of blogs to produce — believe it or not — a regular mass-distributed physical printout of a few webpages. It lasted for about as long as it takes for an electron to orbit a nucleus.

But that’s a case where physical presence simply doesn’t make sense. A person can occupy a geographic area like the UC Berkeley campus, so giving them physical media in that location and about that location is logical. But The Daily Blog was about a whole city as a gateway to the whole internet!

So, what’s the moral of all this?

There’s a lot of talk about hyperlocal online news these days. I like that. But as long as we’re being hyperlocal, it’s important that we don’t miss out on those unique opportunities for offline connections.

Related posts:

  1. Welcome to What May or May not be the Future of Journalism
  2. Who Will Save the Gay Press? Nerds.
  3. Why CBS5′s Brittney Gilbert Loves the Newsroom
  4. How TJ DeGroat Escaped the Blog-Post Ghetto for Social News Networking
  5. NewsTilt: A Brand New Market for Journalism

About the Author

I'm a writer and photographer in San Francisco, curious about how people can get away with writing all day while also being able to afford to buy groceries.